NEW DELHI: Gujarat and West Bengal have raised the red flag on the
setting up of the 7th Pay Commission, saying it would lead to unwanted
financial stress which they cannot afford.
The two states, which are leading the charge in the coming Lok Sabha
elections with their chief ministers as prime ministerial candidates,
have told the Centre that the revision of salaries would increase the
burden on states and this would be most inopportune in view of global
economic slowdown and debt condition.
While Gujarat said the central pay panel's recommendations have
encouraged "contract employment" which is not governed by government
salary structures, Bengal said the pay panel must evolve a mechanism to
provide financial assistance to states to meet costs of salary review -
100% assistance in Bengal's case.
The objection to the pay panel is hardly a populist move given that the
Congress-led Centre decided to announce it ahead of Lok Sabha elections
to woo the voters.
Gujarat, whose CM Narendra Modi is the BJP's PM candidate, said the
financial burden of the 7th Pay Commission would be substantial. It
argued that drastic increase in expenditure because of pay revision
would affect state finances.
In contrast to Gujarat's fear of pay panel hitting its revenue which is
in surplus right now, the Bengal government has taken the opposite
argument that it is already debt-stressed and cannot afford salary
revision.
The Mamata Banerjee regime has demanded 100% financial assistance,
fearing that constitution of the panel for central employees would put
pressure on the state to follow suit.
Banerjee has never hidden the fact that Bengal's finances are in dire
straits, blaming it on the previous Left Front regime, but opposition to
the pay commission is not seen as a savvy move given that employees
form a significant vote base that no political party would like to
antagonize.
In fact, UPA has gone to the other extreme of wooing the vast serving
and retired defence personnel by agreeing that the pay panel would
separately review the salary structure of armed forces keeping in view
of the uniqueness of their service conditions. It has already announced
one-rank one-pension for armed forces.
Expressing helplessness on taking extra salary burden, Bengal has told
the Centre that "it has not been able to grant dearness allowance to
employees at par with central employees".
Speaking against the pay revision, Gujarat said constant hikes by pay
commissions had caused labour market distortions vis-a-vis private
sector salaries.
Also, it added that increasing salaries were forcing states to take
recourse to "contract appointments", creating two sets of employees
which was leading to social and legal problems.
No comments:
Post a Comment